Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Jones v. Valdez et al
as 5:2009cv00486
Plaintiff:
Daniel K. Jones
Defendant:
FNU Valdez and FNU Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. United States Congress et al
as 3:2009cv00289
Plaintiff:
Willie K. Jones
Defendant:
United States Congress, United States of America, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torns et al v. United States Congress et al
as 3:2009cv00273
Plaintiff:
Charles Torns, Jr. and Willis K. Jones
Defendant:
United States Congress, United States of America, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis Jones v. Mississippi Department of Corr, et al
as 09-60248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIS K JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTOPHER EPPS and JOHN & JANE DOES
Jones v. Mississippi State Of et al
as 3:2007cv00243
Plaintiff:
Willis K. Jones
Defendant:
Mississippi State Of and Ronald King
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Mississippi State of, et al
as 09-60055
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIS K JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and RONALD KING
Jones v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv00212
Plaintiff:
Willie K. Jones
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher B. Epps and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Owens et al
as 4:2008cv00039
Plaintiff:
Michael K Jones
Defendant:
Rissi Owens, L, Howard A Thrasher, Sr, Elvis Hightower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Quarterman
as 1:2007cv00227
Petitioner:
Rory K Jones
Respondent:
N. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. Jones et al
as 4:2007cv00814
Plaintiff:
Eddie James
Defendant:
K Jones, Bone, Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
