Cases 21 - 30 of 12,588
Risby v. USA
as 3:2024cv00987
Petitioner:
William Morris Risby
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Sappington v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
William C. Sappington
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service, Memphis TN and Benton County, MS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sappington v. Benton County Arresting Officers
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
William Carl Sappington
Defendant:
Benton County Arresting Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dye v. Cain et al
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Dye
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Brand Huffman, J. Canale and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drake v. MS Dept. of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Drake
Defendant:
MS. Dept of Correction, Mrs. Collier, Mary Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. William et al
as 2:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
Tomarcus Porter
Defendant:
Jason William, Lance Wallance, Beau Bowmen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Jackson et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Anthony Deundra Wilson
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Jackson, Security Warden Unknown Andrews, Chief Unknown Perry and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stallworth v. Walker County, Texas et al
as 4:2024cv01361
Plaintiff:
Bryan Stallworth
Defendant:
Walker County, Texas, Kevin Dehart, Jennifer Lewman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. City of Houston
as 4:2024cv01324
Plaintiff:
Armando Williams
Defendant:
City of Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
