Cases 31 - 40 of 2,571
Barroso v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 3:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Richard Barroso
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brad Livingston and Wren Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lincoln v. Norman
as 3:2022cv02932
Petitioner:
Douglas Lincoln, Jr
Respondent:
Brad Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Heath v. Thrasher et al
as 4:2022cv01129
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Bob Thrasher, James Young, Brad Shepard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barroso v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 2:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Richard Barroso
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brad Livingston and Wren Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glaspie v. Ermatinger et al
as 3:2022cv02743
Plaintiff:
Kevin Neal Glaspie
Defendant:
Cindy Ermatinger, Janet Traylor, John Fehler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cavalier v. Poche et al
as 3:2022cv00924
Plaintiff:
Brad Cavalier
Defendant:
Brock Poche and Ascension Parish Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Whittington et al
as 5:2022cv05928
Plaintiff:
Quincy Dewayne Robinson
Defendant:
Julian C Whittington, Brad Anderson, Lt Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keaton v. Garland
as 22-20542
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bruce Wayne Keaton and Brad Wayne Keaton
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Broussard v. Williams
as 2:2022cv05697
Plaintiff:
Daquincy Jarmaine Broussard
Defendant:
Capt Williams and Brad Conn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kahoe v. Fiol
as 2:2022cv03354
Plaintiff:
Lonnie J. Kahoe, Sr.
Defendant:
Juan Fiol, Sara Jones, Sierra Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
