Cases 31 - 40 of 2,780
Edwards v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00909
Petitioner:
Robert C. Edwards
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Barbier et al
as 2:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Antoine Edwards
Defendant:
Carl J Barbier, Janis van Meerveld, Priscilla R. Owen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Collier et al
as 4:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
William Dexter White and George Edward Tustin, Jr
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, C.F. Hazelwood, Garthe Parker and others
Interested Party:
Joseph J Genovesi and Jason David Sheedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corbett v. Mills
as 24-40136
Plaintiff:
Edward Manual Corbett
Defendant:
Bill Mills, City of Rockport and Aransas County
Edwards v. TDCJ Allred Unit
as 7:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Stephen Edwards
Defendant:
TDCJ James Allred Unit, Kevin Smith and Jimmy Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaines v. Collier
as 3:2024cv00457
Petitioner:
Ernest Edward Gaines
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bealefield v. Odem et al
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Edward Bealefield
Defendant:
Whitney Odem, Chastiny D Harris and Donzell Labrie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welsh v. Correct Care Recovery
as 24-10111
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Correct Care Recovery Solutions, Bryan Thomas, Principle Agent in the State of Texas, Chris Woods, Individually as Director of Security, Texas Civil Commitment Center for Correct Care Recovery Solutions and others
Edwards v. State of Louisiana
as 24-30085
Plaintiff:
Lionel Edwards
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Louisiana
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00293
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
