Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Griffith v. Winn Correctional Center
as 5:2014cv00089
Plaintiff:
Jacob Ray Griffith
Defendant:
Warden Winn Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dupard v. Harper et al
as 2:2014cv00050
Plaintiff:
Kerry Charles Dupard, Sr.
Defendant:
James Harper, Darryl Derbigny, Virginia D. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shackelford v. Murphy et al
as 6:2013cv00742
Petitioner:
Karl Lynda Shackelford
Respondent:
Joseph Murphy, Richard Patteson, f/n/u Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shackelford v. Murphy et al
as 5:2013cv00873
Respondent:
Justice Sam Griffith, Justice Brian Hoyle, Municipal Court of Tyler, Clerk and others
Petitioner:
Karl Lynda Shackelford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Lee et al
as 3:2013cv02448
Plaintiff:
David Allen, III
Defendant:
Chad Lee, Emfinger and Griffith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Buckley et al
as 2:2013cv05099
Plaintiff:
Charles Stewart
Defendant:
Laura Buckley, Bruce Forbes, Kevin Lupor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bass v. Kufel et al
as 4:2013cv00012
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Bass
Defendant:
J. G. Kufel, Todd Kemp, John Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. United States of America et al
as 1:2011cv00735
Defendant:
22nd Judicial District, Tim Griffith, Hays County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony S. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mccoy v. Bossier Press Tribune et al
as 5:2011cv00395
Plaintiff:
Robert McCoy
Defendant:
Bossier Press Tribune, Jim Potts, Larry Deen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubbard v. Carroll-Montgomery Regional Correctional Facility et al
as 4:2010cv00157
Plaintiff:
Robert Anthony Hubbard
Defendant:
Carroll-Montgomery Regional Correctional Facility, A. L. Smith, O. Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
