Cases 31 - 40 of 1,613
Lewis v. Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 1:2023cv00210
Petitioner:
John Brown Lewis, IV
Respondent:
Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Taylor et al
as 3:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
Isaiya Andre Lewis
Defendant:
Sgt. Taylor, Medical Nurse J.M., Medical Nurse C.H. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riche v. Forrest County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Justin Riche
Defendant:
Forrest County Jail, Unknown Lewis, Major Unknown Carson and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lewis vs Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2023cv00185
Petitioner:
Andrew Lewis
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lewis v. Rivers
as 3:2023cv02041
Petitioner:
Courtney Jarmain Lewis and Courtney Jarmaine Lewis
Respondent:
C Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
James v. Bechet, et al
as 2:2023cv05216
Plaintiff:
Joshua Joseph James
Defendant:
S. Bechet and Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canales v. Warren
as 6:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Canales
Defendant:
Officer FNU Warren, Judge Scott Novy, John W. Moore, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Martinez
as 2:2023cv01207
Plaintiff:
Lewis Richard Bennett
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Oden v. Lewis
as 6:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
James Russell Oden
Defendant:
Mike Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Wayburn
as 1:2023cv00170
Petitioner:
John Brown Lewis, IV
Respondent:
FNU Wayburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
