Cases 31 - 40 of 205
Pinkston v. Management & Training
as 22-60161
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chaz D. Pinkston
Defendant / Appellee:
Management & Training Corporation, Jody Bradley, Gabriel Walker and others
Pinkston v. Lee et al
as 5:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Chaz Pinkston
Defendant:
Larry Lee, George Castro, Gabriel Walker and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. United States Of America
as 1:2022cv00281
Petitioner:
Terry Allen Miles
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Miles v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
Clyde Dene Miles
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Wayne Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clemons v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2021cv04052
Plaintiff:
John Clemons
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Rocky Moore, Patrick O'Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2021cv01161
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent:
B. Lumpkin, R. Mooll, R. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 4:2021cv01149
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID, R Moull, R Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Moore et al
as 4:2021cv01084
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Rocky Moore, D. Wonders, FNU Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clemons v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice -CID et al
as 4:2021cv02475
Plaintiff:
John Clemons
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice -CID, Bobby Lumpkin, Rocky Noore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Head et al
as 3:2021cv00270
Defendant:
Victor Woods, Unknown Williber, Unknown Leder and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Sentell Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
