Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 72
David Schmidt v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-10707
Petitioner - Appellant: DAVID ANDREW SCHMIDT
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Schmidt v. Upton
as 4:2015cv00226
Petitioner: Lily Schmidt
Respondent: Jody Upton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Schmidt v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00078
Petitioner: David Andrew Schmidt
Respondent: William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schmidt v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2015cv00078
Petitioner: David Andrew Schmidt
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schmidt v. Director, TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00561
Petitioner: David Andrew Schmidt
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schmidt v. Director TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00535
Petitioner: David Andrew Schmidt
Respondent: Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Adams v. George Schmidt We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-60743
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee: GEORGE W. SCHMIDT
Schmidt v. Director, TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00422
Petitioner: David Andrew Schmidt
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schmidt v. Roesler et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00286
Petitioner: David Andrew Schmidt
Respondent: FNU Roesler and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Schmidt
as 2:2014cv00059
Plaintiff: David Adams
Defendant: George W. Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?