Cases 31 - 40 of 136
Shelby v. Rowe, et al
as 5:2021cv00262
Plaintiff:
Terrence J Shelby, Jr and Andrew Jimenez
Defendant:
Lubbock County, Sheriff Kelly S Rowe, Chief Deputy Le Mike Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Shelby
as 1:2021cv00336
Plaintiff:
Peter Henderson
Defendant:
Georgia Shelby
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Owens et al v. Hayes et al
as 1:2021cv00301
Plaintiff:
Charles Douglas Owens, II and Jess Lee Green
Defendant:
Lawanda Hayes, Ronnie Lampley, Georgia Shelby and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jaramillo v. Texas, TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2021cv00253
Defendant:
Officer Okeshia L. Waters, Assistant Warden Darron Lane, Sergeant Charles A. Halem and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Ray Jaramillo, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Renfro v. Baker et al
as 4:2021cv02172
Defendant:
Bruce Fredricks, Dale Wainwright, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Plaintiff:
Rashard Esaw Renfro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ratliff v. Escontrias et al
as 4:2021cv00029
Defendant:
Tammy Shelby, Captain Miranda, Marlene Escontrias and others
Plaintiff:
David Clayton Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Craft et al
as 2:2021cv00743
Defendant:
Chris Craft, Amy Weirich, Floyd Bonner and others
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Provost v. Richardson et al
as 1:2021cv00149
Defendant:
Randy Doss, Shelby Harper and J. Richardson
Plaintiff:
Kevin Provost
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Bonner et al
as 5:2021cv00025
Defendant:
Judge Chris Craft, Attorney James Jones, District Attorney Amy Weirich and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laughton v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00170
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Shelby Stuart Laughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
