Cases 31 - 40 of 101
Ybarra v. Bustamante, et al
as 1:2018cv00114
Defendant:
FCI Big Spring, Mark Ruckman, Javier Bustamante and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Ybarra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haylock v. Thompson et al
as 4:2018cv00033
Defendant:
Warden Bobby Thompson and Big Spring Flightline
Plaintiff:
Jorge Colomer Haylock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keller v. USA et al
as 1:2018cv00093
Respondent:
USA, DOEs 1-1000, Moes, Does, Roes, U.S. Vessel, and Third Party Libelees, Regional Director and others
Defendant:
T Stuteville, FNU Alsobrooks, FNU Daniels and others
Petitioner:
Daniel E Keller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jeremy Ned v. Dallas Jones, et al
as 18-40559
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEREMY HEATH NED
Respondent - Appellee:
DALLAS JONES, Warden of FCC Beaumont Medium and J. CASTANEDA, Warden of FCI Big Springs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00417
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
281) 358-1076 (fax:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Keller v. USA et al
as 1:2018cv00161
Plaintiff:
Daniel E Keller
Defendant:
usa, Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero-Hidalgo v. Warden CI Big Spring
as 6:2018cv00003
Petitioner:
Gerardo Romero-Hidalgo
Respondent:
Warden CI Big Spring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Payton v. Shoemaker et al
as 2:2017cv00134
Plaintiff:
Reginald B. Payton
Defendant:
Lelis Ann Shoemaker, Eric Winfrey and City of Bay Springs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keller v. USA et al
as 2:2017cv00129
Plaintiff:
Daniel E Keller
Defendant:
USA, Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keller v. USA et al
as 2:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
Daniel E Keller
Defendant:
USA, Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
