Cases 31 - 40 of 631
Moran v. LA Dept of Pub Sfty & Corr
as 22-30787
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Quinten M. Moran
Defendant / Appellee:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Kirt D. Guerin, Walter Gerald and others
Woodberry v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2022cv00979
Plaintiff:
Derrick Woodberry
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Seth Smith, Kirt Guerin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Max-George v. Equifax
as 22-40769
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cecil Walter Max-George
Defendant / Appellee:
Equifax Information Services, L.L.C.
Smith v. Bordelon et al
as 3:2022cv00864
Plaintiff:
Theodore Smith
Defendant:
Donnie Bordelon, Joe Buttross, Stephanie Michel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Badger v. Louisiana et al
as 3:2022cv05451
Plaintiff:
John Robert Badger
Defendant:
State of Louisiana and Walter Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanford v. Huffman
as 1:2022cv00240
Plaintiff:
Walter Sanford
Defendant:
Bland Huffman
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Walters
as 22-60488
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Wade Ashley Walters
Punch v. Marr et al
as 6:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Leroy Joseph Gilbert Punch
Defendant:
Sheriff Justin Marr, Cpt Williamson, Nurse Ullman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walters v. LaSalle Corrections V, LLC
as 3:2022cv00272
Plaintiff:
Mark Walters
Defendant:
LaSalle Corrections V, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moran v. LA. Department Of Public Safety & Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00512
Plaintiff:
Quinten M. Moran
Defendant:
LA. Department Of Public Safety & Corrections, Kirt D Guerin, Walter Gerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
