Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Hawkins v. Harrison et al
as 3:2012cv00768
Plaintiff:
Charles J Hawkins
Defendant:
Billy Harrison, Mike Tubbs, Carl Patrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teddy Spearman v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 12-30124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEDDY L. SPEARMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
ALICE HEADSPETH and JOEL ALEXANDER
Parker v. LeBlanc et al
as 1:2011cv01952
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lionel Parker
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Lynn Cooper, Clyde Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucas v. Williams et al
as 7:2011cv00094
Plaintiff:
Danny Leon Lucas
Defendant:
Eddie C. Williams, Glen H Whitfield, Charles J Vondra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Harrison et al
as 3:2011cv01325
Plaintiff:
Charles J Hawkins
Defendant:
Billy Harrison, Mike Tubbs, Janeen Streeter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. Epps et al
as 3:2011cv00383
Plaintiff:
Jerry Walton
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Margaret Bingham, Donald Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Williams v. Margaret Bingham, et al
as 11-60357
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARGARET BINGHAM, ALICE ARNOLD, SHARON PAGE and others
Carlos Kidd v. Rick Thaler, Director, et al
as 11-40616
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS RAY KIDD
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, RALPH BALES, Prisoner Rape Elimination Act Ombudsman, BRAD LIVINGSTON, Executive Director TDCJ and others
Taylor v. Bingham et al
as 3:2011cv00260
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Taylor
Defendant:
Margaret Bingham, Earnest Lee, Rufus Burkes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Bingham et al
as 3:2011cv00247
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Williams
Defendant:
Margaret Bingham, Alice Arnold, Sharon Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
