Cases 41 - 50 of 1,208
Costelon v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Frank Costelon
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Reid v. Dobbs
as 9:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Lesford Mark Reid
Defendant:
Bryan K Dobbs, Unknown Bartlett, Unknown Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reid v. Dobbs
as 1:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Lesford Mark Reid
Defendant:
Bryan K Dobbs, Unknown Bartlett, Unknown Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sivori v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Frank Sivori
Defendant:
Management & Training Corporation, Donald Jackson, Jeremy Andrews and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNabb v. Bowers
as 3:2023cv00019
Petitioner:
Frank P McNabb
Defendant:
Richard Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lindsey v. Aguilar et al
as 4:2022cv04526
Plaintiff:
Kemuel Lindsey
Defendant:
Judge Frank Aguilar and The Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutson v. Aguillar et al
as 1:2022cv00610
Plaintiff:
John Carl Hutson
Defendant:
Frank Aguillar, III, John B Stevens, Pat Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cloud et al v. Aguillar et al
as 1:2022cv00602
Plaintiff:
Connie Adam Cloud and John Carl Hutson
Defendant:
Frank Aguillar, III, John B Stevens, Pat Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franks v. Lumpkin
as 1:2022cv01360
Petitioner:
Timothy Franks
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
