Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Pledger v. Merchant-McCanbry et al
as 6:2016cv00017
Plaintiff:
Kyle Pledger
Defendant:
Tamara J. Merchant-McCanbry, Sophia Bustos, Latanya Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2016cv00038
Petitioner:
Gill Jarome White
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Thomas Ellis v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 15-60752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EARL ELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, PHIL BRYANT, SERGEANT BARTEE and others
Ellis v. Epps et al
as 1:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Ellis
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Phil Bryant, Unknown Bartee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Telford, TDCJ et al
as 5:2015cv00152
Plaintiff:
Damion D. Hunt
Defendant:
Barry Telford, TDCJ, Utilization Management Review Office, TDCJ, Amber Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jesse Lara v. Joe Shannon, et al
as 14-11170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSE FRANK LARA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE SHANNON, District Attorney - Tarrant County, BRAD LIVINGSTON, STEVEN C. MCCRAW, Director, Department of Public Safety and others
Lara v. Shannon et al
as 4:2014cv00719
Plaintiff:
Jesse Frank Lara
Respondent:
Joe Shannon, Brad Livingston, Steven C. McCraw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lara v. Shannon et al
as 1:2014cv00796
Defendant:
Judge Robb Catalano, Paul A. Conner, Robert K. Gill and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Frank Lara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2014cv00593
Petitioner:
Charles Anthony Gill
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gill Jasmine v. Burl Cain, et al
as 14-30259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GILL W. JASMINE
Defendant - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, KEVIN BENJAMIN, PERRY STAGG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
