Cases 41 - 50 of 1,337
Rios v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Kelly S. Rowe, Gregory Rushin, Dan Corvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Kelly
as 23-30774
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andre Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Tyrone Kelly and Willie Washington, Lieutenant
Mongeau v. Peck et al
as 5:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
Steven Mongeau
Defendant:
FNU Peck and Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. O'Daniel et al
as 7:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
David Allen Kelly
Defendant:
Patrick L. O'Daniel, Bryan Collier, Kevin B. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Speer v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2023cv03958
Plaintiff:
William Keith Speer
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Bryan Collier and Kelly Strong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Strong et al
as 4:2023cv03931
Plaintiff:
Kevin Paul Carter
Defendant:
Kelly L Strong, Bob Castleberry, Michael Kukua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2023cv01199
Plaintiff:
Jedidiah Murphy
Defendant:
Major Bobby Lumpkin, Assistant Chairman Kelly Strong, Bryan Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laws v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2023cv03686
Plaintiff:
Randall Glen Laws and Randell Glen Laws
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Warden Kelly Strong, Major Canul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thorne v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Lance Thorne
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe and Alexus Montemayor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wyatt v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2023cv02151
Petitioner:
George Wyatt, Jr
Respondent:
State of Texas, USA, Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
