Cases 41 - 50 of 191
Johnson v. Peterson et al
as 1:2021cv00256
Plaintiff:
Daryl Fitzgerald Johnson
Defendant:
Troy Peterson, Harrison County, Billy Hewes and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DeLeon v. Peterson et al
as 4:2021cv00134
Plaintiff:
Henry DeLeon
Defendant:
M.D. Marx, M.D. Joshua Peterson, Officer Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. State of Texas Attorney General et al
as 5:2020cv00292
Defendant:
State of Texas Attorney General and John Garvey Doe
Plaintiff:
Cary Lee Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1131 ca
Damond v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2020cv00839
Defendant:
Will Mitchell, Edward Peterson, Correcthealth and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis v. Peterson et al
as 5:2020cv00264
Defendant:
Dental Assistant NFN Thomas, Medical Director NFN Peterson and Dentist Dr. NFN Shropshire
Plaintiff:
LaCharles Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damond v. Martin et al
as 3:2020cv00640
Defendant:
Will Mitchell, Edward Peterson, Correcthealth and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerome v. Barr
as 3:2020cv00476
Plaintiff:
Peterson Jerome
Defendant:
William Barr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wanzer v. Rayford et al
as 5:2020cv00779
Defendant:
FNU Wolf, FNU Alexander, Phonso J. Rayford and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wanzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales v. Rowe et al
as 5:2020cv00052
Defendant:
Sgt NFN Galvan, Leah Peterson, Officer NFN Garza and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCormick v. Krouse et al
as 1:2019cv00976
Defendant:
Unknown Krouse, Harrison County Board of Supervisors, Harrison County Adult Detention Center and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Mason Montrell McCormick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
