Cases 51 - 60 of 74
Reyes v. Mayo et al
as 3:2011cv00180
Plaintiff:
Gilbert S Reyes
Defendant:
Jean A Mayo, Donna J Horn, Brenda L. Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Thompson et al
as 5:2011cv00068
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Williams
Defendant:
Paul I Thompson, Frederick L Gooden and Jeffery K Calfee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fleming v. Gilstrap, et al
as 3:2010cv00433
Plaintiff:
Miles Dean Fleming
Defendant:
K. Gilstrap, Lt. James, Sgt. Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan et al v. Mallia et al
as 3:2010cv00340
Plaintiff:
Jerald D Ryan, Victor Lebrandon and Kenneth Lee Williams
Defendant:
Wayne Mallia, Susan Criss, Lonnie Cox and others
Movant:
Iroc M Bondsteel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fleming v. Capt. K. Gilstrap et al ,
as 4:2010cv02688
Plaintiff:
Miles Dean Fleming
Defendant:
Capt. K. Gilstrap, Lt. James, Sgt. Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caton v. Thaler et al
as 3:2010cv00154
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Lee Williams and Ima Mora
Plaintiff:
Billy Dale Caton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Williams v. Valenti, et al
as 10-20141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LEE WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
VALENTI, Sergeant, LUKER, Captain and BREWER, Captain
Michael Williams v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-20615
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL LEE WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Bubba Williams v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-10785
Petitioner - Appellant:
BUBBA LEE WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Williams v. David Wade Correctional Center
as 5:2009cv00242
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Williams
Defendant:
Warden of David Wade Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
