Cases 71 - 80 of 2,138
Bentley v. Kupp
as 3:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
Carl P Bentley
Defendant:
Allen Kupp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soliz v. Hague
as 23-40330
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roger Soliz, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
M. D. Hague, Doctor Marcus Hinkle, Joy Onougu, Nurse Practioner and others
Toson v. Crozby et al
as 1:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Durand Toson
Defendant:
Jennifer S Crozby, Marcus W Huggins, Gregory P Brannon, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trevino v. Cook
as 23-50382
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Vallejo Trevino
Defendant / Appellee:
Sheriff Maurice Cook, Ms. P. O'Grady, Lieutenant FNU Hanna and others
Winding v. Reeves et al
as 3:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Govornor Tate Reeves, MDCO Commissioner Burl Cain, MS Attorney General Lynn Fitch and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcum v. Sollie
as 3:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Jeffery P. Marcum
Defendant:
Billy Sollie
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jackson v. Louisiana State Penitentiary
as 3:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Wade P. Jackson
Defendant:
Louisiana State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Gaines
as 23-10488
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Ben P. Gaines
Harrison v. Partain et al
as 4:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
Marcus Harrison
Defendant:
H. Partain, Cpl P. Hollie, Sgt D. Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Unknown Respondent 4:23-cv-401-P
as 4:2023cv00401
Petitioner:
Jeremy Jace Smith
Respondent:
Unknown Respondent 4:23-cv-401-P, Clay County Sheriff and Daryl L. Bonnin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
