Cases 71 - 80 of 265
Taylor v. GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
Courtney Fitzgerald Taylor
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc., Warden Ricardo Martinez, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00060
Defendant:
Clarence Anthony, Norman Clarkson, Richard Clinton and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney Fitzgerald Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orange v. Geo Group Inc et al
as 2:2014cv00806
Plaintiff:
Randell Orange
Defendant:
Geo Group Inc, James LeBlanc, Terry Terrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scoggins v. Wise et al
as 2:2014cv00573
Plaintiff:
Antonio Scoggins
Defendant:
Gregory Wise and G E O Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dyer v. The GEO Group, Inc. - Central Texas Detention Facility
as 5:2014cv00139
Petitioner:
Samuel Micah Dyer
Respondent:
The GEO Group, Inc. - Central Texas Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Autin v. G E O Group Inc et al
as 2:2013cv02804
Plaintiff:
Troy Autin
Defendant:
G E O Group Inc, Angela Easom, Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Geo Group Inc et al
as 2:2013cv02594
Plaintiff:
Kennith W Montgomery
Defendant:
Geo Group Inc, Allen Correctional Center, Terry Terrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. G E O Group Inc et al
as 2:2013cv02439
Plaintiff:
Adrian Brown
Defendant:
G E O Group Inc, Angela Easom, Terry Terrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caison v. Epps et al
as 5:2013cv00108
Plaintiff:
William Caison
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Raymond Byrd, James Holman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Houston et al
as 3:2013cv00449
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Tonya Houston , Christopher Wansley, R. Pepper Crutcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
