Cases 81 - 90 of 939
Rogers v. Abbott
as 1:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Delbert Rogers
Defendant:
Gregg Abbott, Wayne Smoker, James Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Ricky Clay Jones
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, H.M. Pederson and S. Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Cooley et al
as 2:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Sanchez Smith
Defendant:
Kieth Cooley, Bobby Young and James M LeBlance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swan v. Warden, Sanchez Unit
as 1:2023cv00014
Petitioner:
Dylan Jeffrey Swan
Respondent:
Warden, Sanchez Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sanchez v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00497
Petitioner:
Arnulfo Sanchez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez-Sanchez v. USA
as 3:2023cv00124
Petitioner:
Vicente Lopez-Sanchez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Sanchez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv00332
Respondent:
Arnulfo Sanchez and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grizzle v. Mcintire
as 22-11193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Grizzle
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryson Mcintire, Madison Hendricks, Lindsay Hummel and others
Valle-Sanchez v. Withers
as 3:2022cv00722
Plaintiff:
Luis Del Valle-Sanchez
Defendant:
Shanon D. Withers
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Roberts v. Lozada
as 22-11175
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reno Preston Roberts
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrea Lozada, Warden I, TDCJ-Institutional Division, David Reed, Jr., Assistant Warden, TDCJ-Institutional Division, Ricardo Ramirez, Major of Corrections Officer, TDCJ-Institutional Divison and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
