Cases 1 - 10 of 488
Hughes v. Captain Gipson et al
as 9:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Charles Harold Hughes
Defendant:
Captain Gibson, Sgt Sykes and Office of the Attorney General - Amicus Curiae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Guidroz et al
as 6:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Harold Hughes, Jr
Defendant:
Bobby Guidroz, Jessie Bellard, J Pickens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roach v. Harold
as 3:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Donaven D. Roach
Defendant:
Unknown Harold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roshell v. Washington et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Daryl G. Roshell
Defendant:
Alice Washington, Unknown Roe, Unknown Harold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tankersley v. Smith
as 23-60622
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Clarence Tankersley, also known as Clarence Douglas Tankersley, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Brandon Smith, Warden C.M.R.C.F., Penny Hamer, Captain C.M.R.C.F., A. Kitchens, Case Manager C.M.R.C.F. and others
Yazzie v. Warden, FMC Fort Worth
as 4:2023cv00922
Petitioner:
Harold Yazzie
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden, FMC Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gordon v. State of Louisiana
as 3:2023cv01262
Plaintiff:
Harold E. Gordon, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelby v. Lumpkin
as 23-50526
Petitioner / Appellant:
Harold Allen Shelby
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Houston v. Arnold
as 3:2023cv00958
Plaintiff:
Harold Houston and Harold Amon Houston
Defendant:
Dy Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Dabadie
as 23-30224
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cornelius Lorenzo Wilson
Defendant / Appellee:
Carl Dabadie, Jr., Baton Rouge Police Chief, Harold Williams, Officer, Jeffrey Pittman, Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
