Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 593
McMullan v. Tanner et al
as 1:2024cv00163
Plaintiff: William B. McMullan
Defendant: Joel Tanner, Shane Bozeman, William Barrett and others
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. E Baton Rouge City Prsh
as 24-30318
Plaintiff: Michael A. James, real party in interest Conner A. James
Defendant: East Baton Rouge City Parish, Sid J. Gautreaux, III, Joshua Clark and others
Tanner v. Metabank (Pathward) et al
as 3:2024cv00110
Plaintiff: Michael A. Tanner
Defendant: Metabank (Pathward), Internal Revenue Service, Pathward and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfers
USA v. King
as 24-50354
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Tanner Lance King
Johnson v. Samaniego et al
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff: Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant: Placido Samaniego, Jr., James Tanner, George W. McGlothlin, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Givens
as 24-50055
Plaintiff: Joshua Jones
Defendant: Ronald Givens, Frank Stengel, Rhonda Hackett and others
Johnson v. Collier
as 24-40148
Plaintiff: Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant: Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Placido Samaniego, Jr., Assistant Warden, Candice Flannel, Assistant Warden and others
Jones, III v. Spurlock et al
as 9:2023cv00222
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Jones, III
Defendant: Gwendolyn Spurlock, Sarah Horace, Robert L. Tanner, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rios v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00271
Plaintiff: John Gabriel Rios
Defendant: Kelly S. Rowe, Gregory Rushin, Dan Corvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bean v. Tanner et al
as 2:2023cv00303
Plaintiff: Joseph Lee Bean
Defendant: Tanner and Flannel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?