Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Vinson v. Unknown Defendant
as 1:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
David Vinson
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant, FNU Bartlett, A. W. Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Vinson v. Colbert
as 3:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Jaylen Vinson
Defendant:
Warden D. Colbert
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Vinson v. Claiborne Parish Detention Center
as 5:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Contravious Vinson
Defendant:
Warden Claiborne Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yazdi v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Fred Yazdi
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McAllister v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
George L. McAllister
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tupper v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
John Tupper
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Borden v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Paul W. Borden
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hopkins v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Steven Hopkins
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fuller v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
Donald Fuller
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burchfield v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Charles Burchfield
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
