Cases 1 - 10 of 840
Banks v. Lumpkin
as 24-40406
Petitioner:
Danny Lee Banks
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Warden-FCI Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
Danny Lee Banks
Respondent:
Warden-FCI Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Banks v. Collier
as 1:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Holston Banks, III
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Yazoo County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 3:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Banks
Defendant:
Yazoo County Sheriff Dept. and James Shires
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Shires et al
as 3:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Banks
Defendant:
James Shires and Y.C.S. Dept.
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Newson v. Chase Bank et al
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Devoris Newson
Defendant:
Chase Bank, Raiz Federal Credit Union, El Paso Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bangmon v. Tucker
as 24-40122
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lenez Bangmon
Defendant:
Calvin Tucker, senior warden, Christopher L. Norsworthy, Assistant warden, Michael B. Crow, Assistant Warden and others
Banks v. Lumpkin
as 24-50092
Petitioner:
Jakroi Allen Banks
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Clark v. Midfast Bank et al
as 2:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Torrance Clark
Defendant:
Midfast Bank, Wells Fargo, Cite Group Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
