Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Lavergne v. Lavespere
as 24-30317
Plaintiff:
Brandon Scott Lavergne
Defendant:
Jacob C. Johnson, Hospital Administrator - Louisiana State Penitentiary, Brady Boudin, Respiratory Specialist - Louisiana State Penitentiary, Cindy Park, Nurse Practitioner- Louisiana State Penitentiary and others
Harris v. Johnson et al
as 3:2022cv00892
Plaintiff:
Edward Harris
Defendant:
Jacob C. Johnson, William Rosso and Tammy Jack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv05672
Plaintiff:
Christopher Moore
Defendant:
C Johnson, C McConnell, C Rivers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stevenson v. Johnson et al
as 3:2022cv00472
Plaintiff:
Bobby Stevenson
Defendant:
Jacob C. Johnson, Paul M Toce and Randy Lavespere
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sonnier v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
Mark A Sonnier
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Tim Hooper, Tracy Falgout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lavergne v. Lavespere et al
as 3:2021cv00344
Defendant:
Jacob C. Johnson, Cindy Park, Brady Boudin and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon S. Lavergne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Johnson et al
as 4:2019cv02651
Respondent:
J. C. Johnson and USA
Petitioner:
Clifford Earl Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hopkins v. Brown et al
as 1:2019cv00118
Defendant:
K Vinson, FNU Neal, H Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Essie Dawain Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roger Johnson v. Rolando Abangan, et al
as 18-60481
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER C. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR ROLANDO ABANGAN, Medical Doctor and OLLIE LITTLE, Nurse, Health Service Administrator
Johnson v. Allen et al
as 4:2018cv01218
Plaintiff:
Arthur C Johnson
Defendant:
JA Allen, P Williams and Harris County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
