Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Whitaker v. Boneberg et al
as 3:2024cv01153
Plaintiff:
Jamison Whitaker
Defendant:
Kevin Boneberg, Hope Sumrow, Robert Daniel Freisner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamison v. Bass
as 3:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Detrayvo Jamison
Defendant:
Nolen Bass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitaker v. Mills
as 3:2024cv01064
Plaintiff:
Jamison Whitaker
Defendant:
Officer Ryan Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00116
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1131 ca Federal Question: Federal Communications Act
Jamison v. Winston Choctaw County Regional Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2021cv00096
Defendant:
Jason Pugh, Neal Higgason, Deputy Warden Watts and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jamison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jamison v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2021cv00014
Petitioner:
Andrew Jamison
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jamison v. Central Mississippi Correctional Facility
as 4:2020cv00214
Petitioner:
Andrew Lee Jamison
Respondent:
Central Mississippi Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jamison v. Central Mississippi Correctional Facility et al
as 4:2020cv00180
Defendant:
CMCF Medical Department, Central Mississippi Correctional Facility, Burl Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jamison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jamison v. King
as 3:2020cv00552
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Andrew Jamison
Respondent:
Ron King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jamison et al v. Central Mississippi Correction Facility et al
as 3:2020cv00291
Defendant:
Tommy Taylor, Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC), Central Mississippi Correction Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jamison and Christopher Powell
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
