Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Thomas v. City of Bay St. Louis, Mississippi
as 1:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
Oscar Thomas
Defendant:
Bay St. Louis Police Department, Rachel Jewell, Steven Lee Saucier and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Burks et al
as 6:2023cv00095
Petitioner:
Antwune Jenkins
Defendant:
Capt Ariel M Burks, Sgt Daryl W. Eason and Srgt Timothy R Larsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
William Carter v. Stuart Jenkins, et al
as 13-20151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM DALE CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
STUART JENKINS, Texas State Parole Division Director, MICHAEL LARSEN, Conroe Texas Parole Agent, PAULA HARDILEK, Conroe Parole Agent and others
Carter v. Jenkins et al
as 4:2012cv03447
Plaintiff:
William Dale Carter
Defendant:
Stuart Jenkins, Michael Larsen, Paula Hardilek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Larsen et al
as 4:2012cv02217
Plaintiff:
William Dale Carter
Defendant:
Michael Larsen, Hardilek, Ms. Takac and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlos Kidd v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 11-40492
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS RAY KIDD
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, LARRY LEFLORE, NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN and others
Carlos Kidd v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 10-40533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS RAY KIDD
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, LARRY LEFLORE, NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN and others
Kidd v. Perry et al
as 9:2010cv00057
Plaintiff:
Carlos Kidd
Defendant:
Rick Perry, Greg Abbott, Mr. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kidd v. Livingston et al
as 6:2009cv00342
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ray Kidd
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Larry LeFlore, Nathanial Quarterman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
