Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Spinks v. Linthicum et al
as 6:2024cv00408
Defendant:
Lannette Linthicum, Amanda Simpson, FNU Gasigwa and others
Plaintiff:
Nancy Jackson Spinks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merritt v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff Office et al
as 2:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
Robert Cowan Merritt
Defendant:
Jefferson Parish Sheriff Office and Joseph Lopinto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carson v. City of Vicksburg et al
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Phillip Carson
Defendant:
City of Vicksburg, Robert Doe WC 74, Lt. Jeff Merritt and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Favre v. Harrison County, MS
as 24-60114
Plaintiff:
Noah Don Favre
Defendant:
Harrison County, Mississippi, Troy Peterson, Sheriff, MBN Agents, ABC to be named and others
Johnson v. Prator
as 24-30058
Plaintiff:
Kareem Abdul Johnson
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Chaplain Patin-Hammond, Director Hicks and others
Merritt v. USA
as 5:2023cv00361
Petitioner:
Dillon J Merritt
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Merritt v. USA
as 5:2023cv00362
Petitioner:
Dillon J Merritt
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. Prator
as 5:2022cv05713
Plaintiff:
Kareem Abdul Johnson
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Chaplain Patin-Hammond, Director Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trevino v. Peel et al
as 4:2022cv02330
Plaintiff:
Raul Adame Trevino
Defendant:
Mike Peel, Former Warden Smith, Grant Dickey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merritt v. Lumpkin
as 22-40416
Petitioner / Appellant:
Le'Troy Dewayne Merritt
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
