Cases 1 - 10 of 13
McCabe v. Ector County et al
as 7:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Buddy Ray McCabe
Defendant:
Ector County, LVN Lori Hodgkins, Director of Nurses Don Robin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Harrison County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv00372
Plaintiff:
Jamar Laneir Dixon
Defendant:
Harrison County Jail, Troy Peters, James Jones and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penns v. Harrison County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv00371
Plaintiff:
Vartaurse Carnelous Penns
Defendant:
Harrison County Jail, Troy Peters, James Jones and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penns v. Harrison County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv00221
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Unknown Webb, Unknown Chinn, Unknown McCabe and others
Plaintiff:
Vartaurse Carnelous Penns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leffew v. Peterson et al
as 1:2019cv00793
Defendant:
Evan Hubbard, Elaine Lege, Unknown Freeman and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Ernest Eugene Leffew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCabe v. Waybourn
as 4:2018cv00324
Petitioner:
David Urian McCabe
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Bowie County et al
as 5:2018cv00043
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Bowie County, Josh R. Morriss, III, FNU Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCabe v. Lederman Law Firm P.C. et al
as 4:2018cv00117
Plaintiff:
David McCabe
Defendant:
Lederman Law Firm P.C. and Pia Rebecca Lederman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCabe v. Waybourn et al
as 4:2018cv00118
Plaintiff:
David McCabe
Defendant:
Bill Waybourn, Cabaio, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
