Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Drones v. TDCJ et al
as 4:2019cv00127
Respondent:
Employees, Director Gabbeaty, Psych Department and others
Petitioner:
Jesse Lee Drones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Drones v. State of Texas TDCJ et al
as 4:2019cv00125
Defendant:
Agency, Agent, Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Drones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drones v. Officers, Employees, Officials, Disciplinary Captains, Counselors, Wardens, Agents, Court Officials et al
as 4:2019cv00134
Respondent:
TDCJ Medical, Mrs. Deer, Nurses and Staff, TDCJ Medical, P.A. Mrs. Deer, Toni Calson, TDCJ Dr., Mr. Jessie Singh, Mrs. Garcia and others
Petitioner:
Jesse Lee Drones
Defendant:
District Court Officials, D.A., Prosecutor and Judge and State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohamed Omran v. USA, et al
as 18-30420
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMED ADMED HASSAN OMRAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OFFICER HARTNET, DAVID COLE and others
Omran v. USA et al
as 5:2018cv00352
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Admed Hassan Abdallah Omran
Defendant:
USA, Hartnet, David Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hudson Edgett v. Grenada County Sheriff Dept., et al
as 17-60486
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HUDSON LYNN EDGETT
Defendant - Appellee:
GRENADA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, SHERIFF STRIDER, TEDFORD WILLIAM, Jail Adm. and others
Lane v. Adms et al
as 3:2016cv00617
Plaintiff:
Karlo Lane
Defendant:
John Adms and Robert Greefeer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Adms et al
as 1:2016cv00132
Plaintiff:
Karlo Lane
Defendant:
John Adms and Robert Greefeer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohamed Abdallah Omran v. Steve Prator, et al
as 16-30034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMED ADMED HASSAN ABDALLAH OMRAN
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE PRATOR, ROBERT WYCHE, DIRECTOR HICKS and others
Mohamed Omran v. Victor Jones, et al
as 15-30922
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMED ADMED HASSAN OMRAN
Defendant - Appellee:
VICTOR JONES and DOVE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
