Cases 1 - 10 of 219
Smith v. Harris County Jail
as 4:2024cv02102
Plaintiff:
Amanda Smith
Defendant:
Harris County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mejia v. Oster
as 24-40380
Plaintiff:
Rene Mejia
Defendant:
Amanda Oster, Sabrina Austell, Jacyn Johnson and others
Profitt v. Hall et al
as 4:2024cv00928
Petitioner:
Amanda Profitt
Respondent:
Tanisha Hall and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Merrill v. Lugo et al
as 4:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Kilo Moran Merrill
Defendant:
Judge Julie Lugo, Court Reporter Karen B. Martinez, Baliff Paul Brinkley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. McMillian et al
as 1:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Hilyerd Williams
Defendant:
Randy McMillian, J. Losoya, Christopher Duggan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Flanigan et al
as 2:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
James Michael Gray
Defendant:
Judge Patrick Flanigan, Amanda Oster and Jacquelyn Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell v. Watson
as 2:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lee Bell, Jr
Defendant:
Amanda Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Vital Core Strategies
as 23-60599
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jacob Blair Scott
Defendant / Appellee:
Vital Core Strategies, Mike Ezell, Sheriff, individual and official capacity, Tyrone Nelson, Captain, individual and official capacity and others
Roth v. McBride et al
as 1:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Roth, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown McBride, Jane Doe, Amanda Harris and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mejia v. Oster et al
as 2:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Rene Mejia
Defendant:
Amanda Oster, Sabrina Austell and Jacyn Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
