Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Bonham v. Barnett et al
as 1:2023cv01000
Plaintiff:
Andrew M Bonham
Defendant:
Ronald Barnett, Mike Gleason and Ghulam Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Branson et al
as 2:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Matthew Phillips
Defendant:
Frank L. Branson, Debbie Dudley Branson, Thomas J Farmers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valero v. Collier et al
as 4:2022cv02272
Plaintiff:
Andrew M. Valero
Defendant:
Brian Collier, C.F. Hazelwood, Moises Villalobos, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2017cv00272
Petitioner:
Andrew M. Shelton
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Christopher Gaither v. Gregory David, et al
as 16-11107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LEE GAITHER
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY S. DAVID, Assistant Warden, RAY D. CRUZ, Captain, GENE W. SMITH, Captain and others
Mixon v. Cortello et al
as 1:2015cv02782
Defendant:
Glen Cortello, Daryl Hickman, Joseph Kutch and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew M Mixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaither v. Cruz et al
as 2:2015cv00104
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Gaither
Defendant:
Gregory S David, Ray D Cruz, Gene W Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winters v. Casanave
as 2:2013cv03143
Plaintiff:
Dale Winters
Defendant:
Andrew M Casanave
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Global Recovery Group, LLC
as 5:2010cv01041
Defendant:
Global Recovery Group, LLC
Plaintiff:
Andrew M. Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troy Perkins v. Andrew Chatham, et al
as 10-10100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TROY LEE PERKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREW M CHATHAM, 282nd Judicial District Court of Dallas County Texas, 282ND DISTRICT COURT CLERK OF THE COURT, Unnamed-Unknown and APRIL SMITH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
