Cases 1 - 10 of 227
Baughman v. Bowman
as 24-40286
Plaintiff:
Steven Kurt Baughman
Defendant:
Jimmy Bowman, Warden, Powledge Unit, Vernon Mitchel, Assitant Warden, Powledge Unit, Ronnie Stanhope, Lieutenant, Powledge Unit and others
Bingham v. Farrell et al
as 9:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
William E Bingham
Respondent:
Christopher Farrell, Donald Muniz and Lt. Caballaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bingham v. Farrell et al
as 4:2023cv04386
Plaintiff:
William Bingham
Defendant:
Captain Christopher Farrell, Warden Donald Muniz and Lt. Caballaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cromey v. Bingham
as 22-40751
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Guisto Cromey, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Matt Bingham, District Attorney, Smith County (Retired), Jacob Putman, District Attorney, Smith County, Jeremy Thompson, Tyler Police Department and others
Cromey, Jr. v. Bingham et al.
as 6:2022cv00210
Defendant:
Michael Guisto Leone, Matt Bingham, Jacob Putman and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Guisto Cromey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gober v. Kennedy et al
as 6:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Brandon Gober
Defendant:
Christi Kennedy and Matt D. Bingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Bingham et al
as 6:2021cv00464
Plaintiff:
Jerremy Raschaad Ray
Defendant:
Matt Bingham, Bryan Jiral, O.W. Loyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grimes v. Collier et al
as 5:2021cv00796
Plaintiff:
John Alfred Grimes
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Cause #007-1311-14, Bobby D. Mims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGee v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2021cv00783
Plaintiff:
Rickey L. McGee
Defendant:
Warden FNU Armstrong, Major FNU Voyles, Officer FNU Montenegro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Bingham et al
as 6:2021cv00287
Plaintiff:
Jerremy Ray
Defendant:
Matt Bingham, Bryan Jiral, O W Loyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
