Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Turner v. Montford Unit et al
as 5:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Douglas D. Turner
Defendant:
Montford Unit and Texas Tech University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Abraseo et al
as 7:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Douglas D. Turner
Defendant:
FNU Abraseo, Texas Tech and Warden at Montford Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guthrie v. Becker et al
as 5:2021cv00505
Defendant:
Leighton Franz Becker, Danny Turner, Christopher D Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Clay Guthrie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watts v. Middlebrooks et al
as 5:2020cv00212
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Albert James Watts
Defendant:
Warden Scott Middlebrooks and Unit Manager D. Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watts v. Middlebrooks et al
as 5:2019cv00121
Defendant:
Warden S. Middlebrooks, CO Ms. Unknown Allen, Warden G. Walker and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Carl Watts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Cook et al
as 6:2018cv00177
Plaintiff:
Terry D Turner
Defendant:
Dusty Cook, Jeremy D Johnson, Joyce A Box and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Williams et al
as 4:2017cv01790
Plaintiff:
Alex JaRaun Howard
Defendant:
Betty Jean Williams, Ernestine A Julye, Khari Mott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Wathen et al
as 7:2015cv00163
Defendant:
NFN Wathen, NFN Harris, NFN Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Litrey D Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Prince
as 3:2012cv00146
Respondent:
James Caldwell and Howard Prince
Petitioner:
Michael D. Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2009cv00280
Petitioner:
Gary D Turner
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
