Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Woods v. Morgan City
as 6:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
Christopher D Woods
Defendant:
Police Dept of Morgan City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 4:2024cv02142
Defendant:
FNU Russian, FNU Alfred, F/N/U Pavanchiluvoju and others
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Defendant:
Warden FNU Coger, Warden FNU Gould, Warden FNU Feazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Defendant:
Warden FNU Coger, Warden FNU Gould, Warden FNU Feazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00106
Petitioner:
Brandon D Woods
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woods v. Prison Officials
as 3:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Brandon D Woods
Defendant:
Prison Officials
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Fourth Court of Appeals et al
as 5:2017cv00351
Defendant:
226th District Court, Criminal Court of Appeals, Fourth Court of Appeals and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton D. Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Red River Parish Jail
as 2:2016cv17888
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Wood
Defendant:
Red River Parish Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Darrell McCurdy v. Seaburns, L.L.P., et al
as 13-41271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL SEABURN MCCURDY
Defendant - Appellee:
SEABURNS, L.L.P., T. D. HAMMONS, Individually and in his official capacity, KARLA D. WOOD and others
Darrell McCurdy v. T.D. Hammons, et al
as 13-11264
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL SEABURN MCCURDY
Defendant - Appellee:
T. D. HAMMONS, Individually and in His Official Capacity, KARLA D. WOOD and TEXAS POTTER COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
