Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,694
Corrales v. Robinson
as 24-40398
Petitioner: Jose Luis Corrales
Respondent: S. Robinson, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute Beaumont Low
Chavez v. Hijar
as 24-50427
Petitioner: Raul Chavez
Respondent: Sandra Hijar, Warden, FCI La Tuna, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Pate v. Warden FCI
as 24-50428
Petitioner: Frank Edwin Pate
Respondent: Warden Federal Correctional Institution La Tuna Camp
Cabello v. Hijar
as 24-50407
Petitioner: Archie Cabello
Respondent: Sandra Hijar, Warden, La Tuna Federal Prison
Matthews v. Federal Medical Center Warden
as 4:2024cv00405
Petitioner: Eric Martin Matthews
Respondent: Federal Medical Center Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Davila v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 4:2024cv00386
Plaintiff: Miguel Davila, Jr
Defendant: U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons South Central Regional Office and Office of Management and Budget
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Ellis-Erkkila v. Manske
as 24-50329
Plaintiff: Priscilla Ann Ellis-Erkkila
Defendant: Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Manske, Magistrate Judge Gilliland, Administrative Courts Counsel and others
Young v. Sam B. Hall Federal Building et al
as 2:2024cv00271
Plaintiff: Travion Dondrell Young
Defendant: Sam B. Hall Federal Building, Bradney Randall Smith, Cortne Maresse Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jennings v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00017
Plaintiff: Prince George Crowling Jennings
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and United States of America Federal Reserve
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00831
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?