Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Gaskin v. Harris County et al
as 4:2020cv00197
Defendant:
Texas, Office of Attorney General, Harris County and Harris County Jail
Plaintiff:
Andre Gaskin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaskin v. Harris County et al
as 4:2019cv04907
Defendant:
Harris County and U.S. Marshall's Headquarters
Plaintiff:
Andre Gaskin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myles v. Stewart et al
as 5:2018cv01470
Defendant:
Mallory A Richard, Mike Spence, James E Stewart, Sr and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wayne Myles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Green et al
as 5:2018cv00086
Defendant:
Capt. Unknown Green, Major Unknown Daniels, Ofc. Unknown Huey and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manuel v. Manuel et al
as 2:2017cv01099
Plaintiff:
Justine Ray Manuel
Defendant:
Judy Ann Manuel, Danny Ray Manuel, Julia Gaskins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Gaskin v. Christopher Epps, Commissioner, et al
as 16-60182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM LEWIS GASKIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DOCTOR RON WOODALL and DOCTOR GWEN WOODLAND
Sosa-Jimenez v. Ferriol, M.D. et al
as 3:2014cv00714
Plaintiff:
Eder Noe Sosa-Jimenez
Defendant:
Eduardo Ferriol, M.D., Salvatore Ricotta, M.D., Jeff Gaskin, DDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaskin v. Epps et al
as 2:2013cv00097
Plaintiff:
William Lewis Gaskin
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Woodall and Woodland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaskin v. Jackson
as 1:2013cv00029
Plaintiff:
William Lewis Gaskin
Defendant:
Kathy King Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Caddo Parish et al
as 5:2012cv02558
Plaintiff:
Johnny B Wright
Defendant:
Caddo Parish, City of Shreveport, Court of Appeal 2nd Circuit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
