Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 465
Hanson v. Gomez
as 5:2024cv00217
Defendant: NFN Gomez
Plaintiff: Dale Ray Hanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Yazoo City USP We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00430
Respondent: Yazoo City USP
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Petitioner: Alberto Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Guerrero v. Lumpkin
as 24-20290
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner: Sergio Gomez Guerrero
Gomez v. USA
as 4:2024cv00366
Petitioner: Santos Gomez
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Silva-Gomez v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00355
Petitioner: Eric Silva-Gomez
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gomez Munoz v. USA
as 3:2024cv00811
Petitioner: Francisco Antonio Gomez Munoz
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Colon v. Hooper et al
as 2:2024cv00756
Plaintiff: Irwin Gomez Colon
Defendant: Tim Hooper
Respondent: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gomez v. Cutler
as 1:2024cv00295
Petitioner: Martin Gomez
Respondent: Sheriff Gary Cutler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gomez v. Cutler
as 6:2024cv00140
Petitioner: Martin Gomez
Respondent: Sheriff Gary Cutler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cheng v. Gomez et al
as 4:2024cv00674
Plaintiff: Sheng-Wen Cheng
Defendant: Natzely Gomez, Angel Gomez and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?