Cases 1 - 10 of 536
Harrison v. Lumpkin
as 24-20231
Petitioner:
Wendell Harrison
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
James v. E Baton Rouge City Prsh
as 24-30318
Plaintiff:
Michael A. James, real party in interest Conner A. James
Defendant:
East Baton Rouge City Parish, Sid J. Gautreaux, III, Joshua Clark and others
Clay v. Schiwart et al
as 7:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Tyrone La'Shawn Clay
Defendant:
Carl Schiwart, Jana Harrison, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Harrison
as 24-60238
Petitioner:
Clarence Martin
Respondent:
C. Harrison, Warden, Yazoo City Low
Whitten v. The 71st District Harrison County Court, Texas
as 2:2024cv00276
Petitioner:
Landon Whitten
Defendant:
The 71st District Harrison County Court, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01423
Petitioner:
Wendell Harrison
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 9:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Wendell Harrison
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Property Officer Garret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lizana v. Harrison County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Lizana
Defendant:
Harrison County Jail, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Troy Peterson and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Wendell Harrison
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00101
Petitioner:
Wendell Harrison
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
