Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Hopper v. Collier
as 6:2024cv00456
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Petitioner:
Steven Lawrence Hopper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hopper v. M.D. Smith
as 4:2023cv00737
Petitioner:
Polly Hopper
Respondent:
M.D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Smalley-Hopper v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2021cv04232
Plaintiff:
Jordan Bailey Smalley-Hopper
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Management Training Corporation and Jester 1 Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopper v. Federal Medical Center Carswell
as 3:2020cv03201
Plaintiff:
Polly Hopper
Defendant:
Federal Medical Center Carswell, A Gardner, NFN Blaire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galbraith v. Hooper
as 3:2019cv00181
Defendant:
Timothy Hopper
Petitioner:
Samuel Galbraith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hopper v. Mississippi Department of Corrections
as 4:2018cv00243
Petitioner:
Terrell Patrick Corvette Hopper
Respondent:
Mississippi Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hopper v. Mississippi Department of Corrections
as 1:2018cv00341
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Terrell Patrick Corvette Hopper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson v. Hopper
as 2:2018cv02280
Plaintiff:
Quitman Nelson
Defendant:
Tim Hopper and Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hopper v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2018cv00165
Petitioner:
William Preston Hopper
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hopper v. Attorney General et al
as 1:2017cv00128
Plaintiff:
John Hopper
Defendant:
Attorney General and Unknown Parties 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
