Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Prescott (PS) v. Hopkins et al
as 6:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Terrie Hopkins, Tanya Hudnall, Ron Steffa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Parker
as 5:2020cv00139
Plaintiff:
Marchristian J Thomas
Defendant:
Garth Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bogus v. Davis et al
as 4:2020cv02146
Defendant:
Major J Thomas, Lorie Davis, Edgar Hulipas and others
Plaintiff:
Brett David Bogus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Harris County, Texas
as 4:2016cv02121
Plaintiff:
David J Thomas, Jr
Defendant:
Harris County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. USA
as 2:2012cv02994
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Brandon J. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
Manuel Plaisance v. Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al
as 09-30842
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANUEL PLAISANCE
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY, BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY, in His Individually and Official Capacities as Warden of Angola, DARREL VANNOY, in His Individual and Official Capacities as Deputy Warden of Angola Prison and others
Parker v. Ross et al
as 4:2008cv02802
Plaintiff:
Spencer Parker
Defendant:
J Ross and J Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaisance v. Louisiana State Penitentiary et al
as 3:2008cv00497
Plaintiff:
Manuel Plaisance
Defendant:
Louisiana State Penitentiary, Burl Cain, Darrel Vannoy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Malley v. TDCJ Inst Division
as 07-40936
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK EUGENE MALLEY
:
KENNY JONES, JERRY WAYNE ALLEN, SR., CHARLES BATES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION
Richardson v. Manning et al
as 5:2007cv00141
Plaintiff:
Freddie Lee Richardson
Defendant:
Stephen Manning, Dana Butler, NFN Voharo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
