Cases 1 - 10 of 18
McClure v. Doyle et al
as 2:2017cv00167
Plaintiff:
Robert Troy McClure
Defendant:
L. Doyle, J Webb, J Boyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert McClure v. Bryan Collier, Executive Dir, et al
as 17-10351
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT T. MCCLURE
Defendant - Appellee:
BRYAN COLLIER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, JANE/JOHN DOE, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Food Director, L. DOYLE, Senior Warden of Texas Department of Criminal Justice 'Robinson' (sic) Unit and others
McClure v. Collier, et al
as 1:2017cv00029
Plaintiff:
Robert T McClure
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Jane/John Doe, L. Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. Deville
as 5:2016cv01338
Petitioner:
Frederick J Webb
Defendant:
Keith Deville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGary v. Boyle et al
as 7:2014cv00108
Defendant:
JC Boyle, Major J Webb and T Metzger
Plaintiff:
Jarrard McGary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McBride v. Dallas Police Department et al
as 3:2014cv00042
Plaintiff:
Matthew K McBride
Defendant:
Dallas Police Department, J Webb and NFN Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winding v. Rutledge et al
as 3:2013cv00289
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
C. Rutledge, J. Breakfield, F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Lard et al
as 4:2013cv00078
Defendant:
V. Lard, J. Webb, L. Prude and others
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClain v. Lard et al
as 4:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
Nigel McClain
Defendant:
V. Lard, J. Webb, L. Prude and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Huggins et al
as 3:2013cv00215
Defendant:
D. Huggins , M. Powe , R. Rice and others
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
