Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Carter v. Jackson et al
as 3:2022cv00344
Plaintiff:
James Carter
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Jackson, Commisioner Burl Cain and Premier Supply Link
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Correctional Institutional Division (CID) et al
as 9:2021cv00165
Plaintiff:
James Carter, .
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Correctional Institutional Division (CID) and Donald Muniz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. M.D.O.C. et al
as 4:2021cv00067
Defendant:
Inmate Monty G # ?, M.D.O.C. Commissioner Burl Cain, Tim Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Herrin v. Villasana et al
as 1:2019cv00545
Defendant:
Mitchell Newman, Rebecca Cloud, Officer Josh Hancock and others
Plaintiff:
James Mark Herrin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2017cv00062
Petitioner:
James Carter
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carter v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2017cv00106
Petitioner:
James Carter
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Crockrom v. Olden et al
as 4:2012cv02071
Plaintiff:
Donald James Crockrom
Defendant:
Robert Olden, Rick Thaler, Robert D. Herrerra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Brown
as 4:2011cv01492
Plaintiff:
James Carter
Defendant:
Lakesha Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2007cv00549
Petitioner:
Larry James Carter
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Edwards et al
as 1:2007cv01254
Defendant:
Barry Rainey, Justin Green, Toney Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
LeTony James Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
