Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Favre v. Harrison County, MS
as 24-60114
Plaintiff:
Noah Don Favre
Defendant:
Harrison County, Mississippi, Troy Peterson, Sheriff, MBN Agents, ABC to be named and others
Porter v. Bennett et al
as 2:2022cv04036
Plaintiff:
Tomarcus Porter
Defendant:
Aaron Bennett, Dillon Tynes, Lloyd Spears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyons v. Ladner
as 22-60206
Petitioner / Appellant:
Aaron Lyons
Respondent / Appellee:
Ronald King and Brian Ladner, Warden, Central Mississippi Correctional Facility
Cherry v. Holmes et al
as 1:2019cv00369
Defendant:
Unknown Wormley, Unknown Lajae, Unknown Hubbard and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jacquaz Donnell Cherry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Ladner et al
as 3:2019cv00243
Defendant:
James Fillyaw, William Moody, Deputy Warden Vivian Frazier and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Ladner et al
as 3:2019cv00208
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Vivian Frazer, Deputy Warden James Fillyaw, Warden Brian Ladner and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Ladner et al
as 3:2019cv00028
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Estus James Smith
Defendant:
Warden Brian Ladner and Sgt. Tirah Mixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamage v. CO-11 Jenkins et al
as 3:2018cv00868
Defendant:
Brian Ladner, CO-11 Jenkins, Latisha Brooks and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Melvin Gamage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keel v. Ladner et al
as 3:2018cv00227
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and Brian Ladner
Petitioner:
James Keel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Gibbs v. Ladner et al
as 4:2018cv00183
Respondent:
Jim Hood and Warden Ladner
Petitioner:
Henry Gibbs, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
