Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Wiliams v. Doe #1 1:24-cv-08 et al
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff: Joseph Lee Williams
Defendant: John Doe #1 1:24-cv-08, John Doe #2 1:24-cv-08, P Reilley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bordelon We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01101
Plaintiff: Eddie Lee Williams
Defendant: Donnie Bordelon
Respondent: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Lumpkin
as 3:2021cv00288
Petitioner: Andrew Lee Williams
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01005
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. Director, TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2020cv00039
Petitioner: Ronny Lee Williams
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Buggs et al
as 3:2019cv00829
Defendant: Lloyd N Womack, Tracy Bedford, Victoria M Buggs and others
Plaintiff: Robert Lee Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. USA
as 4:2019cv00453
Petitioner: James Lee Williams, II
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. Vannoy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00350
Petitioner: David Lee Williams
Respondent: Jeff Landry and Darrel Vannoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Stone et al
as 3:2019cv00563
Defendant: Skip Russell, Sara Knox, Dr Hearn and others
Plaintiff: Robert Lee Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronny Williams v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 18-40767
Petitioner - Appellant: RONNY LEE WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?