Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 289
Beckstrand v. Beckstrand
as 24-10199
Plaintiff: Kevin Beckstrand
Defendant: Erin Beckstrand, Vice President, Fidelity Investments, Lloyd Whelchel, Assistant District Attorney, Tarrant County Texas and Richard J. Corbitt
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00207
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Woods v. Houston Police Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00722
Plaintiff: Bryant Woods
Defendant: Houston Police Department, Ian Thomas Lloyd and Lori Chambers Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Tynes et al
as 2:2024cv00503
Plaintiff: Tomarcus Porter
Defendant: Johnathan Tynes, Charles Griffin, Aaron Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. USA
as 2:2024cv00122
Petitioner: Lloyd E Curry
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
Nicolais v. Cheramie et al
as 2:2023cv07094
Plaintiff: Christopher Vincent Nicolais
Defendant: Brad Cheramie, Robert Shaw, Detective Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kurland v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04431
Petitioner: Lloyd Kurland
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vonallman v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv01450
Plaintiff: Joseph Lloyd Vonallman
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cooks v. Riley et al
as 5:2023cv01446
Plaintiff: Lloyd Cooks
Defendant: E R T Riley and Lt Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beckstrand v. Beckstrand et al
as 4:2023cv00869
Plaintiff: Kevin Beckstrand
Defendant: Erin Beckstrand, Lloyd Whelchel and Richard J. Corbitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?