Cases 1 - 10 of 179
Coe v. Ewing et al
as 7:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Brenton L Coe
Defendant:
John M. Ewing, Sherin Dackairaj, Nadia Maria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Griffis et al
as 7:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Joe A. Medina
Defendant:
Sheriff Mike Griffs, Commissinor Michael Gardner, Captain FNU McKinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Lumpkin
as 23-20565
Petitioner / Appellant:
Willie Medina, also known as Guillermo Flores Medina
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Medina v. Lumpkin
as 23-70003
Petitioner / Appellant:
Anthony Medina
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Medina v. Hirsch et al
as 6:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Jose A Medina
Defendant:
Billy Hirsch, Senior Warden Jimmy Bowman, Lisa Mcclain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00796
Petitioner:
Ernesto Medina
Respondent:
Major Bobby Lumpkin and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medina-Morales v. Martinez Jr
as 2:2023cv00713
Plaintiff:
Carlos Medina-Morales
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Medina v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv02041
Petitioner:
Ernesto Medina
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vizcayno v. Medina et al
as 7:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Guadalupe Vizcayno
Defendant:
Sgt. Lydia Long Medina and Sgt. Arnie R. Juala
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00334
Petitioner:
Willie Medina and Guillermo Flores Medina
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
