Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Smith v. F C I Pollock et al
as 1:2024cv00983
Plaintiff:
Derek A Smith
Defendant:
F B O P and Warden F C I Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Modisett v. F B O P et al
as 1:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Michael Antwaine Modisett
Defendant:
FBOP, Agents and F B O P
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bolden v. F B O P
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Jer'Marise Bolden
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and F B O P
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Taylor v. FBOP
as 1:2022cv05949
Petitioner:
Versiah M Taylor
Respondent:
Warden of F B O P
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. USA et al
as 2:2022cv02380
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Jackson
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden Oakdale and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Casby v. Unknown Named Agents et al
as 1:2021cv00143
Defendant:
Unknown Named Agents, Unknown Pollock, B O P South Central Regional Office and others
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Casby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stewart v. F B O P et al
as 1:2020cv00511
Plaintiff:
Dale Stewart
Defendant:
F B O P and C McConnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valdez v. Marshal Service et al
as 6:2013cv02376
Plaintiff:
Sabina Luna Valdez
Defendant:
U S Marshal Service, F B O P Employee, U S Marshal Medical Employee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bonneville v. Hudson et al
as 5:2010cv00119
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Scott Bonneville
Defendant:
David L Hudson, Jeffery K Calfee, Jenny L Baird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonneville v. Hudson et al
as 4:2010cv00359
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Scott Bonneville
Defendant:
David L Hudson, Jeffery K Calfee, Jenny L Baird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
