Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Metcalf v. Unidentified Defendants
as 3:2022cv00985
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gerald Metcalf, Jr
Defendant:
Unidentified Defendants, R C Tindall, Terrence Ervin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Salazar et al
as 5:2021cv01285
Plaintiff:
Ellery Carter
Defendant:
Javier Salazar, Susan Pamerlaeu, Bexar County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruse Jr. v. Mississippi Dept of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv00150
Plaintiff:
Andrew c. Cruse Jr.
Defendant:
Mississippi Dept of Corrections, Vitalcore Health Strategies, M.D.O.C. Cheif Medical Director Dennis Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02025
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wetzel v. Gamble et al
as 5:2013cv00698
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Defendant:
Robert C Tanner, Michael Harrell, Darryl Mizell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tholonaus Pomier v. M. Leonard, Jr., et al
as 12-41312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOLONAUS POMIER
Defendant - Appellee:
M. E. GEAN LEONARD, JR., R. C. DE LA CRUZ, JR. and KURT SISTRUNK
Harold Black v. Concordia Parish Rehab Center, et al
as 12-30688
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD JOE BLACK
Defendant - Appellee:
CONCORDIA PARISH REHAB CENTER & FACILITY II, RUSSELL BUTLER, RANDY MAXWELL and others
Sparks v. Leonard et al
as 3:2010cv00320
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean Sparks
Defendant:
M. E. Gean Leonard, Jr, R. C. DeLaCruz, Jr., Kendra Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arroyo v. Thalor
as 6:2010cv00341
Petitioner:
Saul Arroyo
Defendant:
R C Thalor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Griggs v. Thaler
as 4:2009cv02790
Petitioner:
Jeff Wayne Griggs
Respondent:
R C Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
