Cases 1 - 10 of 179
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00401
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Guillot v. Wade
as 24-30247
Plaintiff:
Dylan Guillot
Defendant:
Warden Wade, Asst Warden Dear, Deputy Warden Cupp and others
Freeman v. Bowers et al
as 4:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Berry Raydell Freeman
Defendant:
Rodger E. Bowers, Dustin T Wanders, Christopher N. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De Pute v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Rodger De Pute
Defendant:
United States of America, K Bandas, Kenneth Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCall v. Rodgers
as 24-50039
Plaintiff:
Rafi Wali McCall
Defendant:
Tyler Rodgers, Sergeant-Odessa Police Department, Kaaiako Vavo, Corporal-Odessa Police Department, Jason Leach, Public Defender and others
Rodgers v. Edwards
as 24-30049
Plaintiff:
Gary Daniel Rodgers
Defendant:
John Bel Edwards, Louisiana Governor, James Lablanc, Secretary of the State, Mayor of New Roads and others
Rodgers v. Edwards
as 23-30922
Plaintiff:
Gary Daniel Rodgers
Defendant:
John Bel Edwards, Louisiana Governor, James Lablanc, Secretary of the State, Mayor of New Roads and others
Guillot v. Wade et al
as 3:2023cv01369
Plaintiff:
Dylan Guillot
Defendant:
Warden Wade, Asst Warden Dear, Deputy Warden Cupp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Ponce et al
as 4:2023cv02709
Plaintiff:
Mark Andrew Garcia
Defendant:
Guadalupe F Ponce, Pablo Picado, Brandon McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard v. Rodgers et al
as 6:2023cv00303
Plaintiff:
Damien Bernard
Defendant:
William C. Rodgers, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brian Collier, Executive Director, Warden J. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
